Blog

Bad Guys in the White House…24 November 2024


      **Bad Guys in the White House
By: Bill O'Reilly / September 22, 2024

        Bad Guys in the White House
     Americans have elected some dubious people to run our show,
and it always leads to pain. However, there's a difference between
personal badness and terrible policy.  For example, President
Carter was a well-intentioned man but was in way over his head,
hurting the country in significant ways.
     Conversely, Thomas Jefferson cannot be considered a good guy
but was a political genius. Many of the citizen protections he
advocated remain in place today.
     I write about all this in "Confronting the Presidents," as
the struggle to find "good" leaders is, of course, ongoing. We had
another chaotic situation this year, so it is worth looking back.
     Elected in 1856, President James Buchanan was by a wide margin
the worst president of all time, as we document in the book.
Cowardly, with no sympathy at all for enslaved human beings, Buc-
hanan did nothing as the South rose in ferocity. His weak admin-
istration directly led to the Civil War.
     President John Tyler was actually a traitor. Lyndon Johnson
and Warren Harding exceedingly corrupt.  And then there's President
Joe Biden.
     Although my coauthor Martin Dugard dissents, I consider Mr.
Biden the second worst president in history.   Most bad presidents
inherited problems they couldn't fix or made worse.  Think Herbert
Hoover. He didn't cause the Great Depression but was clueless in
helping Americans gravely damaged by it.
     Joe Biden is a different cat, as Dennis Miller might say.  He
created problems. On his first day in office, he opened the southern
border to millions of migrants now in the country unsupervised.
Biden didn't have to do it. Congress wasn't even involved. Joe
simply waved everyone in and has never explained why.
     Even the often-inebriated Franklin Pierce would have been
appalled.
     And remember that Biden, Vice President Harris, and Homeland
Security chief Alejandro Mayorkas all told the country the border
was secure for three years.
     But then, confronting an election, they suddenly changed their
minds, which might qualify them for the Cynicism Hall of Fame.
     No doubt Andrew Jackson would have called this out in a big
way, maybe with a dueling pistol.
     President Biden also drove the inflation rate from 1.4 percent
to more than 9 percent. Working Americans continue to suffer from
that. Joe blamed the surging prices on Trump. Two words: homework,
dog.
     Biden and Harris cede nothing, of course. Few bad leaders do.
Buchanan wrote a book blaming the Civil War on Congress. Nobody
read it.
     Finally, in order to cast a responsible vote, you have to know 
stuff. That's not easy in a country where propaganda is now a
thriving industry. That's why I wrote "Confronting" to provide
perspective about the lows and highs of presidential votes.
     Finally, she probably doesn't know it, but Kamala Harris is
doing exactly what Warren Harding did in his 1920 campaign: no
meaningful interviews. 
     And while Warren H. got away with it, the country was very
badly served by his White House presence.
     Worth considering 104 years later.**
     Since Bill wrote this, we have a cumulative inflation of over
23%, costing the average family $1200 per month over 2019. He sold
off over half of the nations Strategic Petroleum Reserves. Gas
prices reached $5 a gallon, many grocery items have doubled, and
so many other things that ALL could have been avoided.
     The corrupt Democratic Party was so screwed up that they form-
ed a coup and kicked Joe to the side and installed Kamala Harris
as the candidate for President without a single vote in primary
and she proceeded to destroy the party and hand Trump a his second
term.
     Now the Left is trying to start WWIII out of their hatred for
Trump, Republicans, and the American people.
     God has  given us another chance to save our nation and Trump
has hit the ground running. His cabinet is made of qualified souls
that want what is best for the U.S. and not what is in it for them
but what's best for ALL Americans.
     So now we are blessed to get rid of the Biden Crime family and
a large percentage of the corrupt media, so now we wait until we
can stop the racism and "The View"
     We have an awesome God and hopefully a new beginning.
  Conservatively,
  John

How to Waste over $50M…18 November 2024

       How to Waste $50M and Get Nothing

      This is How the Left Wasted Our Money
      How to Waste $50M and Get Nothing
     Benjamin Clark | November 13, 2024
     Special Counsel Smith’s $50M Effort to Prosecute Trump Draws
Scrutiny
     Special Counsel Jack Smith's pursuit of legal action against
President-elect Donald Trump has drawn attention for its
unprecedented scope and financial implications.
     According to Newsmax, the investigation and prosecution efforts
led by Special Counsel Jack Smith have reportedly consumed more than
$50 million in taxpayer funds since his appointment by Attorney
General Merrick Garland in November 2022.
     Attorney General Garland's appointment of Smith launched two
major federal investigations targeting the former president.
     These investigations resulted in indictments related to class-
ified document handling and alleged attempts to overturn the 2020
election results. Trump has maintained his innocence, pleading not
guilty to all charges brought against him.
     DOJ Financial Transparency Under Scrutiny
     Department of Justice officials have demonstrated reluctance to
provide detailed financial information about the special counsel's
operations. Despite Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, the
DOJ has cited "unique circumstances" as justification for withhold-
ing timely responses, noting Smith's office's unusual position
within the agency structure.
     This lack of transparency has raised questions about account-
ability and oversight of the special counsel's resources.
     Financial records through March revealed expenditures exceeding
$35 million, as reported by Forbes in August. Subsequent spending
data covering April through September remains unreleased, leaving
the public with incomplete information about the investigation's
total cost.
     Using available spending patterns as indicators, estimates
suggest the final figure could approach $60 million by the time of
Trump's inauguration.
     Legal experts have begun questioning the substantial financial
investment in these prosecutions. Professional analysis suggests
the investigations' outcomes may not justify their extensive costs,
particularly given recent political developments.
     Legal Community Weighs Investigation Merit
     Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani offered a critical
assessment of the special counsel's efforts. His evaluation high-
lighted concerns about the investigation's effectiveness and value
proposition for American taxpayers.
     Attorney John Perlstein shared this perspective on the invest-
igation's fiscal responsibility, stating:
     Government resources should be allocated more effectively, and
I say this from the standpoint of someone who is not a supporter of
Mr. Trump. All of those cases never made any sense to me. And now
that they will seemingly be going away, that money was wasted.
     Congressional oversight has intensified following recent poli-
tical shifts. Republican leadership in both chambers has taken
active steps to preserve investigation-related documentation,
demonstrating increased scrutiny of the special counsel's
activities.
     Future Proceedings and Deadline Pressures
     Judge Tanya Chutkan's recent ruling has established critical
timeline parameters for the prosecution. A December 2 deadline
looms for Smith's team to determine their approach to the election
interference case.
     This deadline arrives at a pivotal moment, as the Justice
Department reportedly considers winding down federal cases against
the president-elect.
     Political transitions and electoral outcomes have significantly
impacted the investigation's trajectory. Trump's victory over Vice
President Harris in Tuesday's election has introduced new complex-
ities to the ongoing legal proceedings, potentially affecting their
continuation and resolution.
     Concluding Overview of Special Counsel Activities
     Special Counsel Jack Smith's extensive investigation into
Donald Trump's activities has become one of the most expensive
special counsel investigations in recent history.
     The probe, initiated in November 2022, has focused on class-
ified document handling and election interference allegations,
accumulating costs exceeding $50 million.
     As the Justice Department contemplates its next steps, the
investigation faces an uncertain future. With Trump's recent elec-
toral victory and mounting pressure from Republican congressional
leadership, decisions about the prosecution's direction must be
by December 2, potentially marking a significant shift in this
made complex legal and political saga.**

     In one of these cases, Trump wasn't allowed to defend himself.
     In another the accuser could not remember when, where, or even
the time of year.
     In another case, Trump's who was a President was charged for
having classified documents that he had declassified. They raided
his home illegally and yet, Biden, Pence, Clinton, and Obama all
had classified documents and were never even investigated.
     The other case was Trump paying off a hooker who later said
that they never were intimate.
     The corrupt judges know that ALL of the cases will be dropped
when appealed so they are trying to weaponize the DOJ to stop him
from getting re-elected and it ALL failed even after two attempts
to assassinate him.
     I hope everyone involved get indicted and sued until they are
completely broke and then disbarred.
     God has delivered us with a 2nd chance to save this once 
great nation and the swamp is finally drained after 60 years.

   Conservatively,
   John


There Must Be A Reckoning…10 November 2024

      Post Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A 
Reckoning
      By: John Daniel Davidson / November 07, 2024

      We can’t just say ‘Oh well we’re all Americans in the end’
and pretend that everything is okay. Everything is not okay. Back
in July after the first Trump assassination attempt, I wrote that
there can be no national unity, no burying the hatchet or cooling
the rhetoric with people who have been encouraging political
violence and pushing assassination prep for years. You can’t smack
someone's face with a hammer and then insist everyone calm down.
     Trump’s election victory doesn’t change that. Those in the news
media who spent years calling Trump a fascist and comparing him to
Hitler, claiming he represents a threat to democracy and that he’ll
use his presidential powers to go after his enemies, should not be
forgiven. Their lies and nonstop propaganda should not be forgotten.
No one should ever take them seriously again. When they try to en-
gage the public square, they should either be ignored entirely or
met with a wall of mockery and derision. They are enemies of the
American people, whom they openly despise, and there can be no real
unity with them no matter what they might say in the future.
     Going forward, it should be a mark of shame to be associated
with MSNBC, CBS News, and CNN. Same goes for The New York Times,
The Washington Post, The Atlantic, and Politico. All the “prestige”
media outlets that perpetrated lies, distortions, and unhinged
rhetoric about Trump should lose so much credibility that their
reader and viewer bases collapse, advertisers abandon them, and
they get broken up and sold off for parts. If Laurene Powell Jobs
wants to run a vanity magazine for her own entertainment, fine.
But let’s not pretend it’s a serious place where serious journal-
ists work. We all know what it is now.
     Legacy media outlets, the polling industry, the Democrat-fun-
ded nonprofits and the academics and activists who run them have
all now been exposed as cogs in a giant propaganda machine. Kamala
Harris was never ahead. She never had a chance of winning. There
was no “joy.” She wasn’t “brat.” She didn’t even win the Democrat
Party nomination, it was handed to her in a backroom deal. She
isn’t relatable or cool, she’s the most cringey and fake person
ever to run for president. Corporate media and the Democrats ran a
massive psy-op on the American people to make them believe some-
thing that wasn’t true. And it failed. We should never forget that
these people will say anything for the sake of power, so we should
never trust them again.
     For the government officials and institutions who tried to
bankrupt and jail Trump, there should be more severe and formal
consequences. On Wednesday it was reported that the Justice Depart-
ment will be dismissing Special Counsel Jack Smith and dropping his
cases against Trump before Trump takes office. That’s great, but
Smith should not be allowed to simply walk away. He and everyone
else at Biden’s DOJ who was involved in these lawfare cases against
Trump needs to be investigated and held accountable for their
actions.
     And of course the problem goes far beyond Smith. What the Jus-
tice Department and the FBI did to Trump was one of the most egre-
gious abuses of power in American history, and we shouldn’t just
shrug our shoulders at it because Trump won. These agencies need to
be dismantled entirely and re-built from scratch. The FBI in parti-
cular has shown itself to be an enemy of the American people and a
danger to the republic. Its director, Christopher Wray, should not
simply be allowed to resign. He should be removed and placed under
criminal investigation. 
     Same goes for New York Attorney General Leticia James, whose
lawfare against Trump is an ongoing scandal. James said on Wednes-
day that her office is preparing to “fight back” against the in-
coming Trump administration. She should be disbarred, at a minimum
for trying to bankrupt Trump with a bogus fraud case in which there
were no fraud victims. 
     Then there’s Liz Cheney, who in her role as vice chair of the
Jan. 6 Committee has been accused of inducing witness perjury,
destroying documents, and suppressing exonerating evidence. Cheney
posted what seemed like a message of conciliation on X Tuesday
night, saying we must accept the results of the election. But she
shouldn’t get off so easily either. Her role in the Jan. 6 Commit-
tee should be fully investigated and she should face criminal
charges if warranted.
     The truth is, if Trump hadn’t won he’d be going to prison. For
supporting Trump, Elon Musk would have been targeted by the govern-
ment, bankrupted, and subjected to years of lawfare. The people who
howled loudest about Trump weaponizing the government against his
political opponents have spent years doing just that to Trump and
his associates.
     The idea that we should just forget all that now for the sake
of unity is deeply misguided and naïve. If those responsible aren’t
held accountable, they will never stop trying to destroy their
enemies by any means they can. Before we ever achieve anything like
unity in America again, there must be a reckoning and there must be
justice. Without those things, the divisions in our country won’t
be able to heal. 
     Even with a reckoning, unity will be difficult. We can’t just
say “Oh well we’re all Americans in the end.” That won’t cut it.
The stark reality is that there are a large number of our country-
men who are no longer Americans in any meaningful sense. As Glenn
Ellmers has written, they “do not believe in, live by, or even like
the principles, traditions, and ideals that until recently defined
America as a nation and as a people. It is not obvious what we
should call these citizen-aliens, these non-American Americans; but
they are something else.”
     After those who broke the law are held accountable, and those
who lied are ostracized and ignored, we will still face the problem
of disunity and division among our people. We will still be two
nations occupying the same territory, with two irreconcilable
visions of what the country should be. We can’t paper over those
differences, and we shouldn’t.
     To achieve real and lasting unity we’ll need a counter-revol-
ution in America, a re-founding of the country. That in turn will
require a conversion of the American people and a return to the
ideals, principles, and way of life that made our republic possible
in the first place.**

     There should be a price paid by the Left before we unite and
cautiously work together.
     Let God be our guide.

  Conservatively,
  John
 

Things We All Should Know… 30 October 2024

           Things We All Should Know to Be Informed

       'After a bout with Covid and a slight accident I will again
    try to get caught up.'

	      Things you should know to be well informed	
	Neffenger is on Biden's transition team.
        - Neffenger was the President of the board of Smartmatic
        - Smartmatic (another voting machine supplier) entered into
an agreement with Dominion in 2009
        - Smartmatic counted votes in Venezuela
        - Smartmatic is connected to Philippine voter fraud
        - Smartmatic is run by Lord Mark Malloch Brown who works
for George Soros (-he and Brown are life-long friends)
        - Brown chairs the Boards of a number of non-profit boards
including the Open Society Foundation,
        - Brown chairs the Centre for Global Development.
        - Open society of course is owned by George Soros
        - Smartmatic partnered with DLA Piper Global
        - Douglas C. Emhoff works at DLA Piper Global
        - Douglass C. Emhoff is Kamala Harris's husband
        - Guess who owns Dominion? - -Blum Capital Partners, L.P.
        - Guess who is on the board for the company? -- Richard
Blum.
        - Richard C. Blum is Dianne Feinstein's husband.
        - Nancy Pelosi's husband is also a major investor
        - An aide to Nancy Pelosi, Nadeam Elshami, was
hired by Dominion Voting Systems
      And it goes on.....
        - Dominion Voting Systems is listed on the Clinton
Foundation website.
        - Dominion Voting is listed as a $25,000 -$50,000 donor
to the Clinton Foundation in 2014 by The Washington Post
        - Georgia Governor Kemp used Dominion Voting after Texas
and Florida rejected them
        - Dominion has a lobbyist named Jared Thomas
        - Jared Thomas was Governor Brian Kemp’s chief of staff
and press secretary from 2012 to 2015
        - You must remember the Feinstein-Kavanaugh-Soros con-
nections to understand this next information
        - Debra Katz (Christine Ford's lawyer) worked for George
Soros at the Open Society Foundation.
        - Debra Katz (Christine Ford's lawyer) also worked at
Project on Government Oversight (POGO).
        - POGO is funded by Soros’s Open Society Foundation.
        - POGO is the co-signer of the letter Diane Feinstein
presented against Kavanaugh's nomination.
        - Kamala Harris did not prosecute One West Bank for their
fraud when she had the authority - Soros owned One West Bank. 
      Now you know why a woman who placed 7th in her own State
when running for President is now VP! 
      Of course they tell us Donald Trump is the danger to our
democracy! 
      This links to a previous post where I outlined the family
connections of the corrupt Pelosi's and many others who have
used the American taxpayer and insider information to mass a
multi-million dollar fortune trading on secure soon-to-be deals
between the U.S. and countries and industries around the world.
      America deserves better and many of these connections need
to be investigated and prosecuted.
     I pray that God will judge them just like they have treated
mankind and God will intervene and save our once great nation.

   Conservatively,
   John



The Shroud of Turin linked to Jesus… 20 October 2024


	 Shroud of Turin is Linked to Jesus
	 **Shroud of Turin Blood Study Shows Link to Jesus
      By Charlie McCarthy / Thursday, 05 September 2024

     The blood stains on the Shroud of Turin are consistent with
the description of torture and crucifixion of Jesus Christ in the
Gospels, a new scientific study from Italy finds.
     Giulio Fanti, a professor of mechanical and thermal measure-
ments at the University of Padua, says a macroscopic and micro-
scopic analysis of the blood stains on the Shroud accurately re-
flects "the physical conditions relating to Jesus Christ."
     Fanti also found the wounds are "consistent with the descrip-
tion of Jesus Christ in the holy Bible and, in particular, within
the four canonical Gospels."
     Important: New science finds Shroud captured all energy power
of earth.
     Fanti's and several other scientific inquiries have confirmed
that the Shroud contains evidence of a real person with real blood
and other bodily effluents.
     Fanti says the findings indicate the cloth was used on someone
with bloody injuries, rather than forged using ink, dye, paint, or
other techniques.
     The 14-foot-by-4-foot Shroud of Turin is imprinted with an
image of the body and face of a man wearing a "crown of thorns"
from a plant, and is covered in bloodstains.
     Many Christians consider the Shroud the actual burial cloth of
Jesus and believers have venerated it as a holy relic of Christ's
crucifixion.
     Materials that were typical in ancient Jerusalem also were
discovered, the study says, suggesting the shroud may have origi-
nated in the region and not in Europe where many skeptics think
it was created as a medieval forgery, DailMail.com reported.
     The shroud is kept at the Chapel of the Holy Shroud in Turin,
Italy.
     Latest: Mysterious '3' Mark on Jesus head discovered, his
final message?
     The new study released in July, "New Insights on Blood Evi-
dence from the Turin Shroud Consistent with Jesus Christ's
Tortures," stated that the presence of creatinine particles with
ferritin, which are often a by-product of muscle contractions,
"confirms, at a microscopic level, the very heavy torture suffered
by Jesus of the HST [Holy Shroud of Turin]."
"Numerous bloodstains scattered throughout the double body image
of the HST show evidence that Jesus of the HST was tortured," the
study said.
     "Bloodstained marks all over the body image which are consis-
tent with pre-crucifixion flagellation, bloodstained marks on the
head that are consistent with a 'crown' of thorns, blood marks on
the hand and feet that are consistent with crucifixion and the
bloodstain on the chest that evidences a post-mortem wound that
corresponds with the post-mortem spear wound that Christ received
as is described in the Bible."
     On Aug. 22, the New York Post reported of an image of the face
of Jesus Christ created by artificial intelligence based on the
imprint on the shroud.
     Italy's Institute of Crystallography recently said that a
dating process involving Wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) helped
determine that the shroud appears to consistently date as a 2000-
year-old plus relic, Aleteia reported.
     The Catholic Church never has officially ruled on the shroud's
authenticity, saying judgments about its age and origin belonged
to scientific investigation, OSV News reported.
    *Note: New scanning techniques confirm Jesus did die and saw
energy burst after death.**

     The Catholic Church is also condoning homosexuality and
abortion.
     This was very interesting when you are a follower of God and
His Word. It will open your eyes and make a believer of you.
     Now we must pray that Jesus showers us with His mercy and
grace as we have so many who don't worship God and put their Faith
and future in His hands.

   Conservatively,
   John

Corruption and Democrat Lawyers… 13 October 2024

 
	   Corruption and Lawyers.
      Not sure who wrote this, but it’s a very enlightening
perspective. Sent to me by a friend but no author.

      **As an attorney, I hesitated to forward this as it can be an
indictment against my profession.  But I believe there is much
truth to the article below.  Very thought provoking.  Lawyers are
adversarial and are trained to try to win at all costs.  It may
work in litigation but does not work well when governing our nation.
Trying to win at any costs creates the polarization and hatred that
now fills our country and leaves no room for common sense or legit-
imate debate.
     Every Democrat presidential nominee since 1984 went to law
school, although Gore did not graduate.  Joe Biden (no surprise)
was at the bottom of his class.  Every Democrat vice presidential
nominee since 1976, except for Lloyd Bentsen, went to law school. 
Barack Obama was a lawyer.  Michelle Obama was a lawyer.  Hillary
Clinton was a lawyer.  Bill Clinton was a lawyer.  John Edwards is
a lawyer.  Elizabeth Edwards was a lawyer.  Look at leaders of the
Democrat Party in Congress: Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer is
a lawyer.  Former Senator Harry Reid was a lawyer.
     The Republican Party is different.  President Trump was a
businessman.  Presidents Bush 1 and 2 were businessmen.  Vice
President Cheney was a businessman.  President Eisenhower was a 5
star General.  The leaders of the Republican Revolution: Newt Ging-
rich was a history professor.  Tom Delay was an exterminator.  Dick
Armey was an economist.  Ex-House Minority Leader John Boehner was
a plastics manufacturer.  The former Senate Majority Leader Bill
Frist is a heart surgeon.  Who was the last Republican president
who was a lawyer?  Gerald Ford, who left office 31 years ago and
who barely won the Republican nomination as a sitting president,
running against actor Ronald Reagan in 1976.  The Republican Party
is made up of real people doing real work, who are often the
targets of lawyers. This is very interesting. I had never thought
about it this way before.
    The Democrat Party is made up of lawyers.  Democrats mock and
scorn men who create wealth, like Trump, Bush, and Cheney, or who
heal the sick like Frist, or who immerse themselves in history like
Gingrich.  The Lawyers Party sees these sorts of people, who pro-
vide goods and service that people want, as the enemies of America. 
And so, in the eyes of the Lawyers Party, we have seen the pro-
cession of official enemies grow.  Against whom do Hillary and
Obama rail?  Pharmaceutical companies, oil companies, hospitals,
manufacturers, fastfood restaurant chains, large retail businesses,
bankers, and anyone producing anything of value in our nation.
     This is the natural consequence of viewing everything through
the eyes of lawyers.  Lawyers solve problems by successfully repre-
senting their clients, which, in this case should be the American
people.  Lawyers seek to have new laws passed, they seek to win
lawsuits, they press appellate courts to overturn precedent, and
lawyers always parse language to favor their side.  Confined to the
narrow practice of law, that is fine.  But it is an awful way to
govern a great nation.
     When politicians, as lawyers, begin to view some Americans as
clients and other Americans as opposing parties, then the role of
the legal system in our life becomes all-consuming.  Some Americans
become adverse parties of our very government.  We are not all
litigants in some vast social class-action suit.  We are citizens
of a republic that promises us a great deal of freedom from laws,
from courts, and from lawyers.
     Today, we are drowning in laws.  We are contorted by judicial
decisions.  We are driven to distraction by omnipresent lawyers in
all parts of our once private lives.  America has a place for laws
and lawyers, but that place is modest and reasonable, not vast, and
unchecked.  When the most important decision for our next president
is whom, he will appoint to the Supreme Court, the role of lawyers
and the law in America is too big.  When House Democrats sue
America to hamstring our efforts to learn what our enemies are
planning to do to us, then the role of litigation in America has
become crushing.
     Perhaps Americans will understand that change cannot be brought
to our nation by those lawyers who already largely dictate American
society and business.  Perhaps Americans will see that hope does not
come from the mouths of lawyers but from personal dreams nourished
by hard work.  Perhaps Americans will embrace the truth that more
lawyers with more power will only make our problems worse.
     The United States has 5% of the world's population and 66% of
the world's lawyers!  Tort or legal reform legislation has been
introduced in congress several times in the last several years to
limit punitive damages in ridiculous lawsuits such as spilling hot
coffee on yourself and suing the establishment that sold it to you
and to limit punitive damages in huge medical malpractice lawsuits.
This legislation has been blocked from even being voted on by the
Democrat Party.  When you see that 97% of the political contribu-
tions from the American Trial Lawyers Association go to the Demo-
crat Party, then you realize who is responsible for our medical
and product costs being so high.**

     I finally got past the Covid and Hurricane Milton so maybe
I will do better.
     Don't forget to pray that God will intercede in the election
and save our nation.

   Conservatively,
   John

Women’s Muslim Group Folds…29 September 2024


	   **Women's Muslim Group Folds After DNC Denies Speaker
     By James Morley III | Thursday, 22 August 2024 10:58 AM

     The group Muslim Women for Harris-Walz disbanded after
the refusal by the Democratic National Committee to allow a
Palestinian-American to speak this week, the group announced
Wednesday on social media.
     Earlier in the week, a group of uncommitted delegates
asked the campaign for Vice President Kamala Harris to give
Abbas Alawieh, a delegate from Michigan, a speaking slot at
the main stage of the convention. Alawieh, a Palestinian-
American, was denied, leading to protests outside the United
Center in Chicago.
     "We cannot in good conscience continue Muslim Women for
Harris-Walz, in light of this new information from the Un-
committed movement, that VP Harris' team declined their re-
quest to have a Palestinian American speaker take the stage
at the DNC," the group said in a statement posted on Instagram.
     The group noted that the family of Israeli hostage Hersh
Goldberg-Polin showed "more empathy towards Palestinian Amer-
icans" than Harris or Tim Walz. On Wednesday night, Jon Polin
and Rachel Goldberg-Polin spoke before the crowd and pleaded
for a cease-fire deal to be reached so that the remaining
hostages may return home.
     Tension has developed within the Democratic Party as
leaders struggle to find a coherent message that offers sup-
port for Israel and its war against Hamas while offering
empathy for American Muslims who traditionally vote Democrat.
     In February, Arab and Muslim organizers staged a protest
vote in the critical battleground state of Michigan in which
over 100,000 Democrat primary voters chose "uncommitted" over
President Joe Biden.
     Since Hamas invaded northern Israel on Oct. 7 and killed
1,200 people, the conflict has killed more than 40,000 people
and displaced millions, according to Gaza's Health Ministry.
     "We pray that the DNC and VP Harris' team makes the right
decision before this convention is over. For the sake of each
of us," the group's statement concluded.**

     It is typical of the DNC. They think they don't need
anyone and they don't seem to be bound by the Constitution.
     The number of corrupt Democrats is more than even those
they are aware of.
     They have corrupted the majority of Congress, the DOJ,
the judicial system and then expect patriotic Americans to pay
ANY attention, at all, to anything they say.
     They have destroyed the economy, the education system,
inflation, COLA, the Strategic Petroleum Reserves, nearly all
international trade, and have proven that they do not care
about the American people or the American Dream.
     They check blocks when filling slots rather select those
who are capable and have a clue about the job they are filling
but if their race, color, gender, and sexual preference, etc.
is perverted, they get the job. That is not what the founding
fathers had in mind but the racist, Marxists, Socialists, and
Communists or any combination of them.
     I still pray that God will touch some of their hearts at
least enough to open their blind eyes.

  Conservatively,
  John


Gorsuch Warns Biden…15 September 2024


	*Gorsuch Warns Biden
     Justice Gorsuch Warns Biden to ‘Be Careful’ with Supreme Court
Reforms/Popular Videos
     Citizen Frank Published on August 4, 2024

     Justice Neil Gorsuch is pushing back against President Joe
Biden’s recent proposals to restructure the Supreme Court.
     “I just say: Be careful,” Gorsuch warned in an interview that
aired on “Fox News Sunday.”
     Less than a week after Biden announced he was reversing course
and supporting 18-year term limits for justices and legislation to
create a binding ethics code for the high court, the first of
President Donald Trump’s three Supreme Court appointees encouraged
Americans to think long and hard before taking steps that might
undermine the independence of the judicial system.
     “The independent judiciary … What does it mean to you as an
American?” Gorsuch asked about Biden’s new plan during an interview
linked to a new book Gorsuch is releasing this week. “It means that
when you’re unpopular, you can get a fair hearing.”
     “If you’re in the majority, you don’t need judges and juries,
to hear you, to protect your rights, if you’re popular,” Gorsuch
continued. “It’s there for the moments when the spotlight’s on you
— when the government’s coming after you. And don’t you want a
ferociously independent judge and a jury of your peers to make
those decisions?”
     Gorsuch did not comment directly on the specifics of Biden’s
plan and was not asked during the aired portion of the interview
about some of the events that the president cited as triggering his
about-face on structural changes to the high court. They include
the 2022 Supreme Court decision overturning the federal constitu-
tional right to abortion, the ruling last month granting presidents
some degree of immunity from prosecution for official acts and the
ethics controversies that have enveloped Justices Clarence Thomas
and Samuel Alito.
     In the Fox interview, Gorsuch prefaced his tribute to judicial
independence with a caveat insisting that he was not injecting
himself into the presidential campaign or weighing in on an issue
now the subject of political debate.
     “I’m not going to get into what is now a political issue
during a presidential election year,” he said. “I don’t think that
would be helpful.”
     In an interview with New York Times columnist David French
published Sunday, Gorsuch also demurred when asked directly about
the notion of an ethics code that would be enforced by someone
other than the justices themselves.
     Justice Elena Kagan, appearing at a judicial conference in
California last month, said she supports the idea of some kind of
enforcement mechanism and views its absence as a flaw in the court’s
current ethics policy.
     However, Gorsuch suggested it wouldn’t be appropriate for him
to address his colleague’s suggestion because Biden had since
weighed in publicly on the issue and the subject was now being
“intensely discussed by the political branches.”
     Gorsuch did offer one quip to the Times when asked about the
notion of limiting justices to 18-year terms: “I look forward to a
few years of fly fishing.”
     Gorsuch is expected to continue his book tour this week with
a series of other interviews, including an appearance at the Reagan
Library in California.**
     To have a out-of-control having a childish ranting President
because he is so power hungry that the will of the people no longer
matters should be grounds for impeachment of the President and his
entire cabinet.
     How many decades have the conservative part of America had to
endure the bending and skewing of the Constitution that the last 
time I checked was still the law of the land.
     Most riots and destruction has been done by the Left since
2016 but don't underestimate the power of the right. We all have a
limit as to how much any group can endure.
     It is not the corrupt Democrats to rule the SCOTUS for now.
     I pray to God that they will not regain that power for many
years to come.

   Conservatively,
   John

My Vote…8 September 2024

	Why would anyone vote Democratic?

	Subject: My Vote
	Anonymous
    *Someone recently asked me why I like Trump. My answer was that
I don't really like a lot of things about Trump.  He’s a rich ar-
rogant businessman no doubt it, not my type! He used to use and
abuse the system to benefit himself, this is why he is so qualified
and knows his way around the system that this world revolves around.
He has decided to use his knowledge to benefit the people of this
country and give back to the system that he benefited from so much!
He proved this for 3+ years until he and we were attacked by Covid!
     This election is not about choosing the most likeable person.
     We are voting between two vastly different ideologies. We are
voting for the country we want to leave our children and grand-
children.
     Trump represents the future and has proven that he can deliver.
He is a patriot to the core and even served his country for 4 years
without pay.
     That moment when someone says,
     "I can't believe you're voting for Trump". I simply reply “I'm
NOT voting for Trump.”
     I'm voting for the First Amendment and freedom of speech. I'm
voting for the right to speak my opinion and not be censored.
     I’m voting for secure borders and LEGAL immigration. I am
voting for election integrity to include mandatory voter ID.  (Why
would any American vote against this?)
     I'm voting for the Second Amendment and my right to defend my
life and my family.
     I'm voting for the police to be respected once again.
     I am voting for law & order and an end to allowing protesters
to trespass and burn our cities, destroying innocent small business.
(Tim Walz)
     I am voting for personal responsibility and the end of the
revolving door where criminals are being put back on the street.
(Kamala Harris)
     I'm voting for the next Supreme Court Justice(s) to protect
the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
     I’m voting for a return of our troops from foreign countries
and the end to America’s involvement in foreign conflicts.
     I'm voting for the Electoral College and for the Republic in
which we live.
     I’m voting for the continued appointment of Federal Judges who
respect the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
     I’m voting for keeping our jobs to remain in America and not
be outsourced all over the world - to China, Mexico and other
foreign countries.
     I am voting for doing away with all of the freebies given to
all of the illegals and not looking after the needs of the American
citizens and homeless veterans.
     I'm voting for the military & the veterans who fought for this
country
     I'm voting to keep men out of women's sports.
     I’m voting for peace progress in the Middle East.
     I’m voting to fight against human/child trafficking.
     I'm voting for Freedom of Religion.
     I am voting for the return of teaching math, history, and
science instead of the indoctrination of our children.
     I'm not just voting for one person.
     I'm voting for the future of my Country.
     I'm voting for children and grandchildren to ensure their
freedoms
     America is the greatest country in the world, hence why every-
one wants to immigrate here. So why do you want to change it?
     Why do politicians want to enact policies that have failed in
other countries throughout history?  
     I'm not voting for Trump.
     I'm voting for America.*     
     A friend sent me this perfectly worded reason to vote for the
most knowledgeable and qualified candidate we have had in over
thirty years.
     The Left has lost their way and are being led into Communism
and Marxism because so many refuse to seek the truth and think for
themselves. 
     Our only hope to save our land may be God.

  Conservatively,
  John

Biden Is Out…1 September 2024



     **Biden is OUT, Election in Tailspin
     Published in Blog on July 22, 2024 by Jakob Fay

     After mounting pressure from his base, President Joe Biden
announced he would not seek reelection due to concerns about his
fitness for office, sending the Democratic Party into a tailspin
less than four months before Election Day.
     “My fellow Democrats, I have decided not to accept the nomi-
nation and to focus all my energies on my duties as President for
the remainder of my term,” posted the seasoned Washington veteran
on Sunday, effectively marking the conclusion of his storied 54-
year political career. After a widely panned debate performance
against Donald Trump at the end of June, Biden faced pressure from
the media and other prominent figures in the Democratic Party to
bow out of the race. Previously, he boasted he would only drop out
if “the Lord Almighty came down and said, ‘Joe, get out of the
race.’”
     Less than a month before the Democratic National Convention
(DNC) in Chicago, the party now faces unprecedented questions
about moving forward in the contest against Trump. Following an
assassination attempt on his life, crucial court victories in
Florida, an electrifying vice-presidential running mate announce-
ment, and last week’s RNC, Trump’s recent momentum starkly con-
trasts with the divisions plaguing the Democratic Party.
     Further complicating matters is the dilemma of how to proceed
after Democrats have already cast their votes for Biden in the
primaries. Amidst these concerns, the outgoing president has ex-
pressed “full support” for Kamala Harris. Several states have also
pledged their delegates to Harris.
     By Monday evening, she had secured enough delegates to become
the party’s nominee. However, this does not necessarily guarantee
that she will clinch the position, with Republican officials,
including House Speaker Mike Johnson, threatening to challenge
the legality of replacing Biden sans the primary process.
     “Tonight, I am proud to have earned the support needed to
become our party’s nominee,” Harris announced on “X.” “Over the
next few months, I'll be traveling across the country talking to
Americans about everything on the line. I fully intend to unite
our party and our nation, and defeat Donald Trump.”
     “I think she is no better than him,” Trump reacted to the
possibility of running against Harris instead of Biden. “She
could be far less competent, which is hard to believe.”**

     So 14 million people's vote were just ignored and all those
voters were disenfranchised because Harris has not received one
single vote and the 'powers to be' in D.C. drove off all of the
competition virtually handing Harris the nomination with no
effort or campaigning done.
     I would say that borders on being a coup which is illegal
according to the laws. There is a name for that, "Treason".
     Also Trump spent $100M against Biden. Maybe we will get a
chance to fight this move in court.
     The corrupt media, Left, DOJ, and wealthy puppeteers have
now amassed $540M war chest that has many asking questions as
to where the funds appeared from.
     I pray that Trump can beat the attempts to cheat and do
some deep digging to uncover all the corruption that has been
used to find what happened in the 2020 election right to the
installation of Harris and her "Stolen valor" VP stooge.
     God has a plan for all of us and so many will find them-
selves in a permanent fire and brimstone afterlife.

  Conservatively,
  John