Author: jacohn3062

	 Shroud of Turin is Linked to Jesus
	 **Shroud of Turin Blood Study Shows Link to Jesus
      By Charlie McCarthy / Thursday, 05 September 2024

     The blood stains on the Shroud of Turin are consistent with
the description of torture and crucifixion of Jesus Christ in the
Gospels, a new scientific study from Italy finds.
     Giulio Fanti, a professor of mechanical and thermal measure-
ments at the University of Padua, says a macroscopic and micro-
scopic analysis of the blood stains on the Shroud accurately re-
flects "the physical conditions relating to Jesus Christ."
     Fanti also found the wounds are "consistent with the descrip-
tion of Jesus Christ in the holy Bible and, in particular, within
the four canonical Gospels."
     Important: New science finds Shroud captured all energy power
of earth.
     Fanti's and several other scientific inquiries have confirmed
that the Shroud contains evidence of a real person with real blood
and other bodily effluents.
     Fanti says the findings indicate the cloth was used on someone
with bloody injuries, rather than forged using ink, dye, paint, or
other techniques.
     The 14-foot-by-4-foot Shroud of Turin is imprinted with an
image of the body and face of a man wearing a "crown of thorns"
from a plant, and is covered in bloodstains.
     Many Christians consider the Shroud the actual burial cloth of
Jesus and believers have venerated it as a holy relic of Christ's
crucifixion.
     Materials that were typical in ancient Jerusalem also were
discovered, the study says, suggesting the shroud may have origi-
nated in the region and not in Europe where many skeptics think
it was created as a medieval forgery, DailMail.com reported.
     The shroud is kept at the Chapel of the Holy Shroud in Turin,
Italy.
     Latest: Mysterious '3' Mark on Jesus head discovered, his
final message?
     The new study released in July, "New Insights on Blood Evi-
dence from the Turin Shroud Consistent with Jesus Christ's
Tortures," stated that the presence of creatinine particles with
ferritin, which are often a by-product of muscle contractions,
"confirms, at a microscopic level, the very heavy torture suffered
by Jesus of the HST [Holy Shroud of Turin]."
"Numerous bloodstains scattered throughout the double body image
of the HST show evidence that Jesus of the HST was tortured," the
study said.
     "Bloodstained marks all over the body image which are consis-
tent with pre-crucifixion flagellation, bloodstained marks on the
head that are consistent with a 'crown' of thorns, blood marks on
the hand and feet that are consistent with crucifixion and the
bloodstain on the chest that evidences a post-mortem wound that
corresponds with the post-mortem spear wound that Christ received
as is described in the Bible."
     On Aug. 22, the New York Post reported of an image of the face
of Jesus Christ created by artificial intelligence based on the
imprint on the shroud.
     Italy's Institute of Crystallography recently said that a
dating process involving Wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) helped
determine that the shroud appears to consistently date as a 2000-
year-old plus relic, Aleteia reported.
     The Catholic Church never has officially ruled on the shroud's
authenticity, saying judgments about its age and origin belonged
to scientific investigation, OSV News reported.
    *Note: New scanning techniques confirm Jesus did die and saw
energy burst after death.**

     The Catholic Church is also condoning homosexuality and
abortion.
     This was very interesting when you are a follower of God and
His Word. It will open your eyes and make a believer of you.
     Now we must pray that Jesus showers us with His mercy and
grace as we have so many who don't worship God and put their Faith
and future in His hands.

   Conservatively,
   John

 
	   Corruption and Lawyers.
      Not sure who wrote this, but it’s a very enlightening
perspective. Sent to me by a friend but no author.

      **As an attorney, I hesitated to forward this as it can be an
indictment against my profession.  But I believe there is much
truth to the article below.  Very thought provoking.  Lawyers are
adversarial and are trained to try to win at all costs.  It may
work in litigation but does not work well when governing our nation.
Trying to win at any costs creates the polarization and hatred that
now fills our country and leaves no room for common sense or legit-
imate debate.
     Every Democrat presidential nominee since 1984 went to law
school, although Gore did not graduate.  Joe Biden (no surprise)
was at the bottom of his class.  Every Democrat vice presidential
nominee since 1976, except for Lloyd Bentsen, went to law school. 
Barack Obama was a lawyer.  Michelle Obama was a lawyer.  Hillary
Clinton was a lawyer.  Bill Clinton was a lawyer.  John Edwards is
a lawyer.  Elizabeth Edwards was a lawyer.  Look at leaders of the
Democrat Party in Congress: Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer is
a lawyer.  Former Senator Harry Reid was a lawyer.
     The Republican Party is different.  President Trump was a
businessman.  Presidents Bush 1 and 2 were businessmen.  Vice
President Cheney was a businessman.  President Eisenhower was a 5
star General.  The leaders of the Republican Revolution: Newt Ging-
rich was a history professor.  Tom Delay was an exterminator.  Dick
Armey was an economist.  Ex-House Minority Leader John Boehner was
a plastics manufacturer.  The former Senate Majority Leader Bill
Frist is a heart surgeon.  Who was the last Republican president
who was a lawyer?  Gerald Ford, who left office 31 years ago and
who barely won the Republican nomination as a sitting president,
running against actor Ronald Reagan in 1976.  The Republican Party
is made up of real people doing real work, who are often the
targets of lawyers. This is very interesting. I had never thought
about it this way before.
    The Democrat Party is made up of lawyers.  Democrats mock and
scorn men who create wealth, like Trump, Bush, and Cheney, or who
heal the sick like Frist, or who immerse themselves in history like
Gingrich.  The Lawyers Party sees these sorts of people, who pro-
vide goods and service that people want, as the enemies of America. 
And so, in the eyes of the Lawyers Party, we have seen the pro-
cession of official enemies grow.  Against whom do Hillary and
Obama rail?  Pharmaceutical companies, oil companies, hospitals,
manufacturers, fastfood restaurant chains, large retail businesses,
bankers, and anyone producing anything of value in our nation.
     This is the natural consequence of viewing everything through
the eyes of lawyers.  Lawyers solve problems by successfully repre-
senting their clients, which, in this case should be the American
people.  Lawyers seek to have new laws passed, they seek to win
lawsuits, they press appellate courts to overturn precedent, and
lawyers always parse language to favor their side.  Confined to the
narrow practice of law, that is fine.  But it is an awful way to
govern a great nation.
     When politicians, as lawyers, begin to view some Americans as
clients and other Americans as opposing parties, then the role of
the legal system in our life becomes all-consuming.  Some Americans
become adverse parties of our very government.  We are not all
litigants in some vast social class-action suit.  We are citizens
of a republic that promises us a great deal of freedom from laws,
from courts, and from lawyers.
     Today, we are drowning in laws.  We are contorted by judicial
decisions.  We are driven to distraction by omnipresent lawyers in
all parts of our once private lives.  America has a place for laws
and lawyers, but that place is modest and reasonable, not vast, and
unchecked.  When the most important decision for our next president
is whom, he will appoint to the Supreme Court, the role of lawyers
and the law in America is too big.  When House Democrats sue
America to hamstring our efforts to learn what our enemies are
planning to do to us, then the role of litigation in America has
become crushing.
     Perhaps Americans will understand that change cannot be brought
to our nation by those lawyers who already largely dictate American
society and business.  Perhaps Americans will see that hope does not
come from the mouths of lawyers but from personal dreams nourished
by hard work.  Perhaps Americans will embrace the truth that more
lawyers with more power will only make our problems worse.
     The United States has 5% of the world's population and 66% of
the world's lawyers!  Tort or legal reform legislation has been
introduced in congress several times in the last several years to
limit punitive damages in ridiculous lawsuits such as spilling hot
coffee on yourself and suing the establishment that sold it to you
and to limit punitive damages in huge medical malpractice lawsuits.
This legislation has been blocked from even being voted on by the
Democrat Party.  When you see that 97% of the political contribu-
tions from the American Trial Lawyers Association go to the Demo-
crat Party, then you realize who is responsible for our medical
and product costs being so high.**

     I finally got past the Covid and Hurricane Milton so maybe
I will do better.
     Don't forget to pray that God will intercede in the election
and save our nation.

   Conservatively,
   John

	   **Women's Muslim Group Folds After DNC Denies Speaker
     By James Morley III | Thursday, 22 August 2024 10:58 AM

     The group Muslim Women for Harris-Walz disbanded after
the refusal by the Democratic National Committee to allow a
Palestinian-American to speak this week, the group announced
Wednesday on social media.
     Earlier in the week, a group of uncommitted delegates
asked the campaign for Vice President Kamala Harris to give
Abbas Alawieh, a delegate from Michigan, a speaking slot at
the main stage of the convention. Alawieh, a Palestinian-
American, was denied, leading to protests outside the United
Center in Chicago.
     "We cannot in good conscience continue Muslim Women for
Harris-Walz, in light of this new information from the Un-
committed movement, that VP Harris' team declined their re-
quest to have a Palestinian American speaker take the stage
at the DNC," the group said in a statement posted on Instagram.
     The group noted that the family of Israeli hostage Hersh
Goldberg-Polin showed "more empathy towards Palestinian Amer-
icans" than Harris or Tim Walz. On Wednesday night, Jon Polin
and Rachel Goldberg-Polin spoke before the crowd and pleaded
for a cease-fire deal to be reached so that the remaining
hostages may return home.
     Tension has developed within the Democratic Party as
leaders struggle to find a coherent message that offers sup-
port for Israel and its war against Hamas while offering
empathy for American Muslims who traditionally vote Democrat.
     In February, Arab and Muslim organizers staged a protest
vote in the critical battleground state of Michigan in which
over 100,000 Democrat primary voters chose "uncommitted" over
President Joe Biden.
     Since Hamas invaded northern Israel on Oct. 7 and killed
1,200 people, the conflict has killed more than 40,000 people
and displaced millions, according to Gaza's Health Ministry.
     "We pray that the DNC and VP Harris' team makes the right
decision before this convention is over. For the sake of each
of us," the group's statement concluded.**

     It is typical of the DNC. They think they don't need
anyone and they don't seem to be bound by the Constitution.
     The number of corrupt Democrats is more than even those
they are aware of.
     They have corrupted the majority of Congress, the DOJ,
the judicial system and then expect patriotic Americans to pay
ANY attention, at all, to anything they say.
     They have destroyed the economy, the education system,
inflation, COLA, the Strategic Petroleum Reserves, nearly all
international trade, and have proven that they do not care
about the American people or the American Dream.
     They check blocks when filling slots rather select those
who are capable and have a clue about the job they are filling
but if their race, color, gender, and sexual preference, etc.
is perverted, they get the job. That is not what the founding
fathers had in mind but the racist, Marxists, Socialists, and
Communists or any combination of them.
     I still pray that God will touch some of their hearts at
least enough to open their blind eyes.

  Conservatively,
  John

	*Gorsuch Warns Biden
     Justice Gorsuch Warns Biden to ‘Be Careful’ with Supreme Court
Reforms/Popular Videos
     Citizen Frank Published on August 4, 2024

     Justice Neil Gorsuch is pushing back against President Joe
Biden’s recent proposals to restructure the Supreme Court.
     “I just say: Be careful,” Gorsuch warned in an interview that
aired on “Fox News Sunday.”
     Less than a week after Biden announced he was reversing course
and supporting 18-year term limits for justices and legislation to
create a binding ethics code for the high court, the first of
President Donald Trump’s three Supreme Court appointees encouraged
Americans to think long and hard before taking steps that might
undermine the independence of the judicial system.
     “The independent judiciary … What does it mean to you as an
American?” Gorsuch asked about Biden’s new plan during an interview
linked to a new book Gorsuch is releasing this week. “It means that
when you’re unpopular, you can get a fair hearing.”
     “If you’re in the majority, you don’t need judges and juries,
to hear you, to protect your rights, if you’re popular,” Gorsuch
continued. “It’s there for the moments when the spotlight’s on you
— when the government’s coming after you. And don’t you want a
ferociously independent judge and a jury of your peers to make
those decisions?”
     Gorsuch did not comment directly on the specifics of Biden’s
plan and was not asked during the aired portion of the interview
about some of the events that the president cited as triggering his
about-face on structural changes to the high court. They include
the 2022 Supreme Court decision overturning the federal constitu-
tional right to abortion, the ruling last month granting presidents
some degree of immunity from prosecution for official acts and the
ethics controversies that have enveloped Justices Clarence Thomas
and Samuel Alito.
     In the Fox interview, Gorsuch prefaced his tribute to judicial
independence with a caveat insisting that he was not injecting
himself into the presidential campaign or weighing in on an issue
now the subject of political debate.
     “I’m not going to get into what is now a political issue
during a presidential election year,” he said. “I don’t think that
would be helpful.”
     In an interview with New York Times columnist David French
published Sunday, Gorsuch also demurred when asked directly about
the notion of an ethics code that would be enforced by someone
other than the justices themselves.
     Justice Elena Kagan, appearing at a judicial conference in
California last month, said she supports the idea of some kind of
enforcement mechanism and views its absence as a flaw in the court’s
current ethics policy.
     However, Gorsuch suggested it wouldn’t be appropriate for him
to address his colleague’s suggestion because Biden had since
weighed in publicly on the issue and the subject was now being
“intensely discussed by the political branches.”
     Gorsuch did offer one quip to the Times when asked about the
notion of limiting justices to 18-year terms: “I look forward to a
few years of fly fishing.”
     Gorsuch is expected to continue his book tour this week with
a series of other interviews, including an appearance at the Reagan
Library in California.**
     To have a out-of-control having a childish ranting President
because he is so power hungry that the will of the people no longer
matters should be grounds for impeachment of the President and his
entire cabinet.
     How many decades have the conservative part of America had to
endure the bending and skewing of the Constitution that the last 
time I checked was still the law of the land.
     Most riots and destruction has been done by the Left since
2016 but don't underestimate the power of the right. We all have a
limit as to how much any group can endure.
     It is not the corrupt Democrats to rule the SCOTUS for now.
     I pray to God that they will not regain that power for many
years to come.

   Conservatively,
   John

	Why would anyone vote Democratic?

	Subject: My Vote
	Anonymous
    *Someone recently asked me why I like Trump. My answer was that
I don't really like a lot of things about Trump.  He’s a rich ar-
rogant businessman no doubt it, not my type! He used to use and
abuse the system to benefit himself, this is why he is so qualified
and knows his way around the system that this world revolves around.
He has decided to use his knowledge to benefit the people of this
country and give back to the system that he benefited from so much!
He proved this for 3+ years until he and we were attacked by Covid!
     This election is not about choosing the most likeable person.
     We are voting between two vastly different ideologies. We are
voting for the country we want to leave our children and grand-
children.
     Trump represents the future and has proven that he can deliver.
He is a patriot to the core and even served his country for 4 years
without pay.
     That moment when someone says,
     "I can't believe you're voting for Trump". I simply reply “I'm
NOT voting for Trump.”
     I'm voting for the First Amendment and freedom of speech. I'm
voting for the right to speak my opinion and not be censored.
     I’m voting for secure borders and LEGAL immigration. I am
voting for election integrity to include mandatory voter ID.  (Why
would any American vote against this?)
     I'm voting for the Second Amendment and my right to defend my
life and my family.
     I'm voting for the police to be respected once again.
     I am voting for law & order and an end to allowing protesters
to trespass and burn our cities, destroying innocent small business.
(Tim Walz)
     I am voting for personal responsibility and the end of the
revolving door where criminals are being put back on the street.
(Kamala Harris)
     I'm voting for the next Supreme Court Justice(s) to protect
the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
     I’m voting for a return of our troops from foreign countries
and the end to America’s involvement in foreign conflicts.
     I'm voting for the Electoral College and for the Republic in
which we live.
     I’m voting for the continued appointment of Federal Judges who
respect the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
     I’m voting for keeping our jobs to remain in America and not
be outsourced all over the world - to China, Mexico and other
foreign countries.
     I am voting for doing away with all of the freebies given to
all of the illegals and not looking after the needs of the American
citizens and homeless veterans.
     I'm voting for the military & the veterans who fought for this
country
     I'm voting to keep men out of women's sports.
     I’m voting for peace progress in the Middle East.
     I’m voting to fight against human/child trafficking.
     I'm voting for Freedom of Religion.
     I am voting for the return of teaching math, history, and
science instead of the indoctrination of our children.
     I'm not just voting for one person.
     I'm voting for the future of my Country.
     I'm voting for children and grandchildren to ensure their
freedoms
     America is the greatest country in the world, hence why every-
one wants to immigrate here. So why do you want to change it?
     Why do politicians want to enact policies that have failed in
other countries throughout history?  
     I'm not voting for Trump.
     I'm voting for America.*     
     A friend sent me this perfectly worded reason to vote for the
most knowledgeable and qualified candidate we have had in over
thirty years.
     The Left has lost their way and are being led into Communism
and Marxism because so many refuse to seek the truth and think for
themselves. 
     Our only hope to save our land may be God.

  Conservatively,
  John

     **Biden is OUT, Election in Tailspin
     Published in Blog on July 22, 2024 by Jakob Fay

     After mounting pressure from his base, President Joe Biden
announced he would not seek reelection due to concerns about his
fitness for office, sending the Democratic Party into a tailspin
less than four months before Election Day.
     “My fellow Democrats, I have decided not to accept the nomi-
nation and to focus all my energies on my duties as President for
the remainder of my term,” posted the seasoned Washington veteran
on Sunday, effectively marking the conclusion of his storied 54-
year political career. After a widely panned debate performance
against Donald Trump at the end of June, Biden faced pressure from
the media and other prominent figures in the Democratic Party to
bow out of the race. Previously, he boasted he would only drop out
if “the Lord Almighty came down and said, ‘Joe, get out of the
race.’”
     Less than a month before the Democratic National Convention
(DNC) in Chicago, the party now faces unprecedented questions
about moving forward in the contest against Trump. Following an
assassination attempt on his life, crucial court victories in
Florida, an electrifying vice-presidential running mate announce-
ment, and last week’s RNC, Trump’s recent momentum starkly con-
trasts with the divisions plaguing the Democratic Party.
     Further complicating matters is the dilemma of how to proceed
after Democrats have already cast their votes for Biden in the
primaries. Amidst these concerns, the outgoing president has ex-
pressed “full support” for Kamala Harris. Several states have also
pledged their delegates to Harris.
     By Monday evening, she had secured enough delegates to become
the party’s nominee. However, this does not necessarily guarantee
that she will clinch the position, with Republican officials,
including House Speaker Mike Johnson, threatening to challenge
the legality of replacing Biden sans the primary process.
     “Tonight, I am proud to have earned the support needed to
become our party’s nominee,” Harris announced on “X.” “Over the
next few months, I'll be traveling across the country talking to
Americans about everything on the line. I fully intend to unite
our party and our nation, and defeat Donald Trump.”
     “I think she is no better than him,” Trump reacted to the
possibility of running against Harris instead of Biden. “She
could be far less competent, which is hard to believe.”**

     So 14 million people's vote were just ignored and all those
voters were disenfranchised because Harris has not received one
single vote and the 'powers to be' in D.C. drove off all of the
competition virtually handing Harris the nomination with no
effort or campaigning done.
     I would say that borders on being a coup which is illegal
according to the laws. There is a name for that, "Treason".
     Also Trump spent $100M against Biden. Maybe we will get a
chance to fight this move in court.
     The corrupt media, Left, DOJ, and wealthy puppeteers have
now amassed $540M war chest that has many asking questions as
to where the funds appeared from.
     I pray that Trump can beat the attempts to cheat and do
some deep digging to uncover all the corruption that has been
used to find what happened in the 2020 election right to the
installation of Harris and her "Stolen valor" VP stooge.
     God has a plan for all of us and so many will find them-
selves in a permanent fire and brimstone afterlife.

  Conservatively,
  John

    DHS Issues Rule Protecting Illegal Immigrants Married to US
Citizens
     **Immigrants can start applying for the protection on Aug. 19.
     By Zachary Stieber / 8/20/2024

     The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has unveiled a
new rule that the government estimates will protect about 550,000
illegal immigrants from being deported.
     A federal law called the Immigration and Nationality Act gives
federal officials the ability to grant parole to illegal immigrants
who are already in the United States. DHS officials are using the
powers to grant protection to some illegal immigrants who are
married to U.S. citizens, as directed by President Joe Biden.
     The DHS said that the government is trying to keep families
together and that “granting parole in place, on a case-by-case basis
to eligible noncitizens under this process will achieve the signifi-
cant public benefit of promoting the unity and stability of
families.”
     The department also said that the move would increase the
economic prosperity of U.S. communities, strengthen diplomatic
relationships with partner countries in the region, and reduce the
strain on limited U.S. government resources.
     The rule covers spouses of U.S. citizens who had lived in the
United States for at least 10 years as of June 17. The illegal
immigrants must not have been found to “pose a threat to national
security, public safety, or border security,” according to the DHS.
     About 500,000 of the 765,000 noncitizens who are in the United
States, married to U.S. citizens, and do not have lawful immigration
status are estimated to be eligible for the extension of the parole
authority. That’s the same estimate that the White House gave in
June when the president first announced that officials would shield
spouses.
     Another 50,000 children of these immigrants can also apply for
protection, provided that they’ve been in the United States since
June 17, do not have certain crimes on their record, and do not pose
a threat to national security or public safety, according to the
rule.
     Parole is a temporary measure that gives deportation relief to
noncitizens, allowing them to extend their time in the country or
seek more-permanent legal status.
     Democrats have largely praised the move, which also involves
giving the illegal immigrants work authorization.
      “An estimated 55,000 immigrants in the Houston area are mar-
ried to U.S. citizens and many of them will now be able to live,
work, and raise a family without the fear of deportation,” Rep.
Sylvia Garcia (D-Texas) previously said in a statement.
      But some experts say the move may not be legal.
      There will be “inevitable legal challenges” for the “legally
questionable” rule, Andrew Arthur, a fellow in law and policy at
the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for low levels
of immigration, wrote in a blog post.
     The DHS said that under its interpretation of the Immigration
and Nationality Act, it has the authority to grant parole in place.
It said in the rule that “DHS continues to believe that it reflects
the best reading of the statute.”
     The Florida Immigrant Coalition was among the groups praising
the protection.
     “Approximately 27,000 Floridian families will benefit from
this new program,” Yareliz Méndez-Zamora, federal campaign leader
for the coalition, said in a statement. “This is a much-needed
relief, and we encourage the Biden administration to continue to
use their executive powers to protect family unity, and to ensure
that our long-term neighbors who have been caught in the traps of
immigration bureaucracy have the opportunity to finally complete
their formal residency application.”**

     This is another way to solicit votes but there is a problem
with the way the illegal entered the US. If they entered undocu-
mented in many case they must exit the US and apply for a GREEN
CARD and then wait their turn. There are many different reasons
but the Left have again tried to rewrite the law. This should be
appealed to the SCOTUS and review the changes they made to the
actual Immigration and Nationality Act.
     They even think that any Federal employee has the authority
to grant parole to illegal undocumented immigrants.
     This needs much more scrutiny.
     Again we need to pray for God's race to "Deliver us from
evil".

   Conservatively,
   John

 	    **Why Doesn’t the Left Want Voters to Decide Election?
   Victor Davis Hanson | July 19, 2024

     When Donald Trump seemed to have a lock on the 2016 Republican
primary, the Democratic Party concluded that the people could not
be counted on to do the “right thing” of electing the Democratic
candidate in waiting Hillary Clinton.
     What followed were eight long years of extralegal efforts to
neuter candidate, then president, then ex-president, and then
candidate again, Donald Trump.
     The nonstop efforts were all justified as “saving democracy”
—albeit by nearly destroying it.
     In 2015-2016, the Hillary Clinton campaign fueled the lie that
discredited ex-British spy Christopher Steele had discovered Trump
to be a veritable Russian agent.
     Hillary did not disclose that she had paid Steele—with checks
hidden through three paywalls. The FBI, under Director James Comey,
also hired the fraudster.
     Yet almost nothing in his “Steele dossier” was true.
     The FBI doctored evidence submitted to a FISA court.
Comey leaked to the press confidential documents about his private
conversations with President Trump.
     Comey’s successor, acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe, lied
on numerous occasions to federal investigators.
     Both former CIA Director John Brennan and former Director of
National Intelligence James Clapper repeatedly lied to the nation,
saying that Trump was de facto working with the Russians.
     The result? Trump lost the 2016 popular vote but still won
the Electoral College.
     Next, celebrities and well-funded liberals waged a media cam-
paign to convince the electors to become “faithless.” Left-wing
elites begged them to renounce their constitutional duties and
instead throw the election to Hillary Clinton.
     Once Trump was elected, “Russian collusion” was fired up again
in hysterical fashion.
     A special counsel, Robert Mueller, consumed 22 months of the
Trump presidency. His investigation team constantly leaked false-
hoods about the “walls closing in on” Trump.
     After nearly two years, Mueller announced there was no
evidence of a Trump effort to collude with Russia.
     Next was the first impeachment of Trump—nearly the moment he
lost the House in 2018.
     Supposedly, Trump had leveraged Ukraine to investigate a
corrupt Hunter Biden by delaying foreign aid.
     Trump was impeached on a strictly partisan vote.
     But later, no one denied that the drug-addled Hunter Biden
had indeed gotten rich from Ukraine, or that Joe Biden had fired
a Ukrainian prosecutor looking into his son’s misadventures while
still vice president, or that Trump released all the military
assistance designated by Congress, or that he included offensive
weapons formerly denied Ukraine by the Obama-Biden administration.
     Next, in 2020, when Hunter’s laptop turned up abandoned at a
repair shop and full of incriminating evidence of more Biden family
skullduggery, the left struck again.
     It rounded up “51 former intelligence authorities” to mislead
the American people on the eve of the vote that the laptop was
likely a fake—once again cooked up by Russian disinformation
experts to aid Trump.
     And once more, that was another complete falsehood. But the
lie proved useful to Joe Biden in the debates and campaign. And he
won the election.
     Next, the learn-nothing, forget-nothing left turned to the
2023-2024 campaign.
     This time, their next extra-legal efforts were twofold.
     One, they unsuccessfully sought to remove Trump from some 15
state ballots.
     Two, local, state, and federal courts began to wage lawfare to
convict and jail candidate Trump, or at least bankrupt him and keep
him off the campaign trail.
     Three, county and state prosecutors campaigned on getting
Trump on charges never filed before against a presidential candi-
date—and rarely against anyone else as well.
     The Fani Willis Georgia lead prosecutor met secretly with the
Biden White House counsel.
     Alvin Bragg’s Manhattan team hired the third-ranking federal
prosecutor in the Biden Justice Department.
     Special counsel Jack Smith was found by a court to have been
illegally appointed and much of his case was dismissed.
     On July 13, a shooter nearly killed candidate Trump, nicking
his ear after somehow firing a rifle from a rooftop a mere 140 yards
away—while undetected by law enforcement inside the very same
building below.
     Prior to the shooting, Joe Biden had boasted to donors that
“it’s time to put Trump in a bullseye.”
     Biden had railed nearly nonstop that a Trump victory would
spell the end of democracy—a theme the left had fueled by comparing
ad nauseam Trump to Adolf Hitler.
Yet here we are in mid-July 2024 and Trump, the Republican candi-
date, is alive and leads incumbent Biden—either because of, or
despite, the crude efforts to destroy him.
After nearly a decade of utter madness, can we finally order the
FBI, DOJ, and CIA to butt out of our elections?
Can a bankrupt media cease whipping up hysteria about a supposed
Nazi-like takeover?
Can the left stop relying on washed-up British spies, corrupt
ex-spooks, and teams of clownish partisan prosecutors?
Instead, why not, at last, just let the people choose their own
president?**

     Since this was published, Biden has been forced to withdraw
from the campaign because Trump destroyed him in the only debate
they held and although Biden had received 14M primary votes the
corrupt Democrats installed Harris in as the candidate without her
receiving a single vote. The story is that Pelosi, Obama, and other
unelected Czars threatened Biden with the 14th Amendment so rather
that expose his dismal job and what he had done over the years he
left the race.
     Then Harris picked a communist stolen valor reservist as her
running mate that, if elected will end the United States turn our
once great nation into a third world nation.
     God promised that He will save His people. He is an awesome
God who can overcome anything is we ask.

  Conservatively,
  John

	Information worth knowing.

        The swamp runs deep.

    Things you must know to be informed (sent to me by a friend)
    Conspiracy?  Noooooo way..............certainly not.  Not HERE
..in the good ole US of A.  All of this is just coincidencial. 
.............rrrrright!
    Subject: Things you must know to be informed (sent to me by a
friend)
    *YES, THE GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN USED TO WORK FOR GEORGE SOROS
    *YES, CALIF GOV. GAVIN NEWSOM IS NANCY PELOSI'S NEPHEW
    * YES, ADAM SHIFF'S SISTER IS MARRIED TO ONE OF GEORGE SOROS’
SONS.
    * YES, JOHN KERRY'S DAUGHTER IS MARRIED TO A MULLAH'S SON IN
IRAN.
    * YES, HILLARY'S DAUGHTER CHELSEA IS MARRIED TO GEORGE SOROS'
NEPHEW.
    * YES, ABC NEWS EXECUTIVE PRODUCER IAN CAMERON IS MARRIED TO
SUSAN RICE, OBAMA'S FORMER NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER.
    * YES, CBS PRESIDENT DAVID RHODES IS THE BROTHER OF BEN RHODES,
OBAMA'S DEPUTY NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER FOR STRATEGIC COMMUNICA-
TIONS.
    * YES, ABC NEWS CORRESPONDENT CLAIRE SHIPMAN IS MARRIED TO JAY
CARNEY, FORMER OBAMA WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY.
    * YES, ABC NEWS AND UNIVISION REPORTER MATTHEW JAFFE IS MARRIED
TO KATIE HOGAN, OBAMA'S FORMER DEPUTY PRESS SECRETARY
    * YES, ABC PRESIDENT BEN SHERWOOD IS THE BROTHER OF ELIZABETH
SHERWOOD, OBAMA'S FORMER SPECIAL ADVISER.
    * YES, CNN VP VIRGINIA MOSELEY IS MARRIED TO TOM NIDES, FORMER
HILLARY CLINTON'S DEPUTY SECRETARY.
    Now you know why no one is investigated. They all have their
hands in the cookie jar!  You might remember James Comey who inves-
tigated the Clinton email scandal and the Clinton Foundation, and
made the final decision to not recommend prosecution by the DOJ.
    It turns out that the Clinton Foundation was audited by the law
firm DLA Piper. One of the executives there was in charge of the
Clinton Foundation audit.
    Who was it? Peter Comey, James Comey’s brother. Peter Comey
held an executive position with the Washington law firm that did
the audit of the Clinton foundation in 2015.  Peter Comey was
officially DLA Piper “Senior Director of Real Estate Operations for
the Americas,” in 2015 when the Clinton Foundation scandals first
broke and Hillary was preparing her Presidential campaign.  Not only
was DLA Piper, the firm where Comey’s brother worked involved in the
audit of the Clinton Foundation, but according to the foundation’s
donor records, DLA Piper has given between $50 - 100k to the Found-
ation.
    It gets even cozier.  DLA Piper executive Douglas Emhoff is
taking an extended leave of absence from the firm. Who is Douglas
Emhoff?  He is the husband of KAMALA HARRIS! Just a coincidence? 
Amazing if it is. You can't make this stuff up!
    And it only gets worse.  This "Family Tree" will make your head
spin.
          THE SWAMP IS DEEP!!

    Dominion (voting machine provider) serves 40% of the US market.
It is in 30 states - - The state of Texas rejected the machines.
     - Admiral Peter Neffenger is on Biden's transition team.
     - Neffenger was the President of the board of Smartmatic
     - Smartmatic (another voting machine supplier) entered into an
agreement with Dominion in 2009
     - Smartmatic counted votes in Venezuela
     - Smartmatic is connected to Philippine voter fraud
     - Smartmatic is run by Lord Mark Malloch Brown who works for
George Soros (he and Brown are life-long friends)
     - Brown chairs the Boards of a number of non-profit boards
including the Open Society Foundation,
     - Brown chairs the Centre for Global Development.
     - Open society of course is owned by George Soros
     - Smartmatic partnered with DLA Piper Global
     - Douglas C. Emhoff works at DLA Piper Global
     - Douglass C. Emhoff is Kamala Harris's husband
     - Guess who owns Dominion?  -  Blum Capital Partners, L.P.
     - Guess who is on the board for the company? -- Richard Blum.
     - Richard C. Blum is Dianne Feinstein's husband.
     - Nancy Pelosi's husband is also a major investor
     - An aide to Nancy Pelosi, Nadeam Elshami, was hired by
Dominion Voting Systems

          And it goes on .....
     - Dominion Voting Systems is listed on the Clinton Foundation
website.
     - Dominion Voting is listed as a $25,000 -$50,000 donor to the
Clinton Foundation in 2014 by The Washington Post
     - Georgia Governor Kemp used Dominion Voting after Texas and
Florida rejected them
     - Dominion has a lobbyist named Jared Thomas
     - Jared Thomas was Governor Brian Kemp’s chief of staff and
press secretary from 2012 to 2015
     - You must remember the Feinstein-Kavanaugh-Soros connections
to understand this next information
     - Debra Katz (Christine Ford's lawyer) worked for George-Soros
at the Open Society Foundation.
     - Debra Katz (Christine Ford's lawyer) also worked at Project
on Government Oversight (POGO).
     - POGO is funded by Soros’ Open Society Foundation.
     - POGO is the co-signer of the letter Diane Feinstein pre-
sented against Kavanaugh's nomination.
     - Kamala Harris did not prosecute OneWest Bank for their fraud
when she had the authority.  Soros owned OneWest Bank.
    **Now you know why a woman who placed 7th in her own State when
running for President is now VP!**

     Harris, who is not black but Indian (Sri Lanka) and her Dad
was a mixed breed of Jamaican and several other nations as Jamaica
was a trading island made up of many nationalities who settled
there. She claimed to be Indian when she ran for office in CA and
claimed to be black when she ran for VP.
     We ALL need to pray that this Socialist, Marxist, and anti-
American gets exposed and indicted or impeached.
     The Lord's Prayer says that we must ask Him to "Deliver us
from evil"

  Conservatively,
  John     

	**Here’s Why I Don’t Believe the Legacy Media Was ‘Duped’
    by the White House on Biden’s Mental State
        Tyler O'Neil | July 10, 2024

     Democrats’ freak-out about the mental state of President Joe
Biden has been far too delicious for conservative media.
     Democrats and the legacy media—pardon me for repeating myself
—find themselves between the Scylla of a decrepit figurehead and
the Charybdis of his most likely replacement, the cackling hyena
oft described as “Madame Vice President.”
     We conservatives must restrain ourselves from looking on with
too much glee as the Left rips itself apart. This news cycle may
give the Right a false sense of security.
     Conservative media feel vindicated to finally see the legacy
media admitting what we’ve been covering all along: Biden’s mental
state is a serious problem, and it may even be disqualifying.
     It’s a great “I told you so” moment, but what the legacy media
gives, it can very easily take away.
     CNN columnist Jill Filipovic opened up about how “members of
the press feel angry and betrayed” by the way the White House sup-
posedly hid Biden’s senility in the lead-up to the president’s
horrific debate performance June 27.
     “Many of us largely trusted Biden’s team when they insisted he
was fine,” Filipovic admitted. “The debate made very clear that
he’s not fine,” and “I think there’s rising resentment at being had.
     She suggested the legacy media had been duped, but then she
revealed her true cards.
     “To be clear, the Biden team could fully ‘Weekend at Bernie’s’
him or send three toddlers in a trench coat to the next debate, and
I would still vote Biden over Donald Trump, and will encourage
everyone else to do the same,” Filipovic wrote.
     To be clear, the Biden team could fully Weekend at Bernie's him
or send three toddlers in a trench coat to the next debate and I
would still vote Biden over Donald Trump, and will encourage every-
one else to do the same. But like… not ideal.
     Joy Reid is having a mental breakdown:
     "If it's Biden in a coma, I'm voting for him. This is about
keeping Hitler out the WH."
     — End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) July 4, 2024
     These sentiments reveal the underlying problem: The legacy
media has been looking for an excuse to be “duped,” not because
they are gullible, but because the issue of Biden’s mental acuity
is politically inconvenient. The legacy media has aided and abetted
the effort to dismiss concerns about Biden’s age for years—and only
now do they realize the jig is up.
     Conservative journalists, meanwhile, have been covering this
issue for years, and we are slightly exasperated to see the legacy
media finally decide they can’t hide it anymore. They finally opened
their eyes to the plain truth right in front of them, after years of
demonizing those of us who weren’t playing blind until yesterday.
     Their belated acknowledgement of reality would be encouraging
if they actually took the issue seriously. Biden may be too frail
to carry out the duties of his office—not just in January 2025, but
right now. This is a serious concern, serious enough that Rep. Chip
Roy, R-Texas—no fan of Vice President Kamala Harris—is willing to
call for Harris to become acting president under the 25th Amendment
because America cannot afford an empty suit at the helm as we face
economic turmoil at home and wars abroad.
     “Weekend at Biden’s” is not an option, and it’s quite telling
that many in the legacy media who claim they were duped by the White
House openly say they’re willing to get duped again for the sake of
political expediency.
     They may feign outrage about supposedly being duped until
they’re blue in the face, but the truth is, they’d rather have a
corpse in the White House than Donald Trump. Now, Biden is making
it clear he’s not going away voluntarily, which means Filipovic and
Reid may have to return to being “had.”
     It’s “Weekend at Biden’s” or bust.**

     Democrats and the legacy media are still duping the American 
people for decades.
     It started with Marx, then S. Alinsky, Soros, Clinton, Obama,
and now Biden. They wrote books, papers, Hillary's thesis, and a
flow of plans to "Fundamentally Transform America", all supposedly
in the name of Democracy.
     They have embarrassed the country and have put themselves above
the law and left the rest of the Republic to suffer through how they
have corrupted the media, the Executive Branch and the gullible
left. And to top it off they have proven they don't care about the
middle class and the conservative part of America.
     We have an awesome God and He will deal with them all. May He
protect us from the evil.

  Conservatively,
  John