House Democrat Says He Supported Trump's Bill
Jerry McConway / July 7, 2025
*House Democrat says he supported 75% of Trump’s bill.
Over the last week, all we have heard about his how horrible
Trump’s big, beautiful bill (BBB) is from Democrats.
Now, I did not support the bill, but my resistance is based
on the financials, not the content itself, most of which I
support.
A New York Democrat just revealed he supported about 75% of
the bill, yet he still rejected it.
"It just passed."
When the BBB passed the House on Wednesday, I ate my plate
of crow, although I had prefaced it by saying that there was the
chance the Freedom Caucus was just putting on a big show, and that
is what they did.
The bill was on Trump’s desk for an Independence Day signing,
giving Trump a huge win.
There is a lot to like in the bill, especially on the border,
but my concern was how much money this bill would add to our debt,
especially because the GOP ran on lowering the debt and ending the
budget deficits.
I have never wanted to be wrong more in my life, and I am
rooting for this bill to spark the economy as Trump thinks it will,
and that it will not only pay for itself, but it will also help cut
the nation’s debt, which is now over $37 trillion.
"It’s immoral."
Just before the bill was going to the floor for a vote, House
Minority Leader Jeffries (D-NY) showed up with a couple of binders
that contained a nearly 9-hour speech.
He preached, "This is just one of them. but we wanted to make
sure that the American people had an opportunity to fully and more
completely understand, in the light of day, just how damaging this
one big, ugly bill will be to the American people."
He later added, "This reckless Republican budget is an immoral
document. And everybody should vote no against it because of how it
attacks children, seniors, and everyday Americans, and people with
disabilities.
“This reckless Republican budget is an immoral document. And
that is why I stand here on the floor of the House of Represent-
atives with my colleagues in the House Democratic caucus to stand
up and push back against it with everything we have."
"I agree."
The entire caucus swarmed Jeffries after his speech, treating
him like a rock star, but it was more reminiscent of a scene after
a big win for the debate club. Yet, Rep. Tom Suozzi (D-NY) just
admitted that, as the opposition, he liked most of the bill.
He stated, “I like the idea that we’re investing more money
to secure the border. I like the idea that we are providing tax
breaks to lower-income folks and hard-working middle-class folks
and people aspiring to the middle class.”
He then claimed that the issues he disagreed with were
“devastating,” citing the bogus narrative that Medicaid benefits
will be taken away from the most needy (untrue) and that Trump’s
tax cuts only benefit the wealthiest in this country (untrue).
Now, I have to say, if I were in the opposition, I would be
ecstatic that I could support 75% of a bill from the other side.
I would have come forward to work with the other side to try to
get some of those other points a little less damaging in my eyes
to generate bipartisan support. But you see, Congress is so toxic
that it was never even an option. He had a chance to get Dems a
win here, and he blew it simply because party leadership wanted
nothing to do with this legislation.*
The problem seems to be that Democrats fear their party or
liberal supervisors more than they care about their constituents
or their lying eyes.
Everything they have been fed was written some 60 years ago
by Karl Marx, Saul Alinsky, a pair of communists named Richard
Cloward and Frances Piven who wrote the Cloward-Piven Strategy or
Alinskiy's "Rules for Radicals" (How to be a Socialist).
You will see how these books will force feed you exactly how
they have screwed up everything that was good in the U.S.
In the Strategy it gives you eight steps that Clinton ( the
housing and bank collapse) used HUD to start it. Then Obama stuck
to the book and forced Americans to buy ObamaCare trying to get
us conned into single payer healthcare and he was using Alinsky's
Rules in an effort to push us into depending upon the corrupt
media as their go to news almost exactly like Alinsky wrote them.
Why do you think every time one of them speaks they not only
all repeat the same thing, they lie 'word for word' right in time
with the corrupt media?
It amazes me too that so many want to deny the facts and
can't admit how much better things were for them during Trump's
first term and how much better off we are now and he is only seven
months in.
It saddens me how clueless most of the left are and how
incompetent nearly all of them are.
God promised in the Bible that he would save His people. We
have to pray for His Grace.
Conservatively,
John